"Kill Your Television" posted March 21, 2005 at 12:13 AM
[This is the second entry of the day; the first entry is here.] In 1992, Marie Zaza wrote, in a letter to yours truly, and I quote: I'm sending the article I told you about. Be grateful you don't have a TV--you might not enjoy or have time to enjoy other forms of entertainment. I'm serious, TV is so obtrusive. I don't exactly agree with the writer, with the TV on it's hard to concentrate on anything, including the TV. A person is hypnotized, not concentrating. I found this letter today as I was sorting and shredding old papers--ancient bank statements, rejected poems sent back from magazines, junk mail that got filed in a pile of papers that eventually got shoved into a drawer, etc. And I was really struck by Mom's quote about TV watching, because of something I read earlier today on a blog. I have been so agitated by the current political spectacle in Florida and Washington, and the ridiculousness of the Congress inserting itself into a family matter that has already been decided by the courts. I read an entry by Digby at his blog Hullabaloo about the Schiavo case. He lays out some facts, and then compares that to what's actually being said on TV: By now most people who read liberal blogs are aware that George W. Bush signed a law in Texas that expressly gave hospitals the right to remove life support if the patient could not pay and there was no hope of revival, regardless of the patient's family's wishes. It is called the Texas Futile Care Law. Under this law, a baby was removed from life support against his mother's wishes in Texas just this week. A 68 year old man was given a temporary reprieve by the Texas courts just yesterday. Digby would be a great addition to anyone's daily online reading. Don't let anyone tell you about the "liberal media" and how slanted it all is. It is slanted, but it ain't liberal--not by a longshot. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I keep thinking, in this dark time, that sooner or later Bush, DeLay & co. will cross the line of political propriety so blatantly and incontrovertibly that they will, like Senator Joseph McCarthy, find their ertswhile allies turning away from them in disgust. Maybe transforming the private conflict of a family dispute into grotesque public spectacle will be that sort of Rubicon for them. But I'm afraid that such an outcome would require a stiffer spine and a braver soul than most Democrats seem able to muster. |